Business Management Resources

Several states and the District of Columbia, however, have enacted their own individual mandate requirements, and employers must still offer affordable health coverage to full-time employees — as well as satisfy ACA reporting obligations — or risk federal tax penalties. Even if you are compliant with respect to offering coverage, incorrect or incomplete data can erroneously show you failed to extend affordable coverage and raise a red flag in your IRS reporting, triggering potential penalties and associated headaches. ACA compliance requires organizations to understand the status of employees, especially how many hours they work and whether they are required to receive an offer of health coverage, and effectively track the types and costs of health plans you offer them.

Some solutions are an add-on tool to your payroll or benefits administration software. Others are full service third-party companies who personally handle your filing, similar to how a PEO operates. In this guide, you can expect to find helpful advice for picking the right one for your organization, including key benefits, pitfalls, thoughts and more. While 80% of survey respondents may not have received an IRS penalty notice, it doesn’t mean they won’t. The federal agency has been issuing Letter 226J penalty notices to employers identified as having failed to comply with the ACA’s Employer Mandate for the 2016 tax year, and will continue to do so for subsequent tax years.

Big Data Helps Hr Unlock Robust Employee Retention Strategies

ADP’s survey validates just how difficult complying with the ACA’s Employer Mandate can be. These sorts of requirements have been difficult for some organizations to follow. The ACA requires employers to demonstrate that they’re living up to their end of the health coverage bargain. In the many years since the ACA’s employer mandate took effect, some employers have adjusted to the many wrinkles of compliance, but others still struggle. Tomassetti recalls how one variable workforce client of approximately 10,000 employees previously used a system that only aggregated data and produced forms. This meant that they didn’t have strong internal practices for reviewing and reconciling data inaccuracies, which resulted in form inaccuracies and a multi-million-dollar penalty.

The solution’s user dashboards feature the new ADP Visual Design Language for a consumer-friendly user experience. The solution helps professionals who are not ACA experts pinpoint areas of potential noncompliance at the individual employee level. These dashboards offer business leaders actionable, real-time workforce management strategies to help facilitate compliance. HR teams were handed more responsibility after the passing of the Affordable Care Act in 2010. If your company has 50 or more full-time employees, it is considered an applicable large employer under the ACA.

The ACA is unique because it is the first mandate that requires employers to compile various forms of organizational data monthly — benefits, HR, payroll, multi-employer, leaves — and use that data to determine whether the organization is compliant. This requirement means that there’s a risk of data conflict, which can lead to penalties. Another area in which employers are challenged is how to address affordability requirements under the ACA. The study shows that a significant proportion of employers – who have or are planning to extend health care benefits – report they remain unsure concerning which of the three affordability safe harbors they will utilize for their employees. In addition, the study indicates that nearly 20% of midsized employees and more than a third of large organizations have introduced a low minimum value plan as part of their ACA compliance strategy. Implementing a CDHP with a 60% minimum value would help simplify record keeping and reporting, and could play a role in reducing the Excise Tax penalties – a 40% tax that takes effect in 2018 on high-cost health plans above a certain threshold.

Perhaps the most notable example of how changes to the ACA create complexity for employers is the repeal of the federal individual mandate penalty. Effective this year, individuals will no longer be subject to a federal penalty for failing to enroll in health coverage.

• Even if you are compliant with respect to offering coverage, incorrect or incomplete data can erroneously show you failed to extend affordable coverage and raise a red flag in your IRS reporting, triggering potential penalties and associated headaches.
• The federal individual mandate penalty ended this year, but employers’ responsibilities are still intact.
• Several states and the District of Columbia, however, have enacted their own individual mandate requirements, and employers must still offer affordable health coverage to full-time employees — as well as satisfy ACA reporting obligations — or risk federal tax penalties.
• Perhaps the most notable example of how changes to the ACA create complexity for employers is the repeal of the federal individual mandate penalty.
• Effective this year, individuals will no longer be subject to a federal penalty for failing to enroll in health coverage.

If you have fewer than 50 full-time and FTE employees and don’t offer health coverage, you are not subject to these reporting requirements. If you have fewer than 50 full-time and FTE employees and offer a fully insured health plan, your insurer is responsible for filing the required forms with the IRS and furnishing the forms to your employees. In the early days of their efforts to ensure compliance at the federal level, many organizations focused almost exclusively on the submission of forms required under the Act at the end of the year. What ADP has discovered is that the submission of timely and accurate forms is a byproduct of the organization’s efforts and success in managing proactive penalty avoidance a monthly basis.

Benefits Of Aca Compliance Software

Understanding ACA requirements for employers is only the first of many steps to staying compliant and avoiding large fines. Once you’ve identified if your business is an ALE and to which of your employees you must offer health coverage, the next challenge to tackle is accurately tracking employee time and attendance – a feat many employers have struggled with for decades. ACA reporter has also come to know that the IRS has issued its ‘final’ drafts of instructions for employers with guidelines to report regarding health coverage, which they offered employees last year .

In the beginning, employers focused their attention on preparing and delivering forms. Then, in the fall of 2017, the U.S. federal government began activating additional pillars of the ACA. For example, the threshold for how many ACA-eligible employees to whom an employer had to offer health insurance was 75 percent in 2015, and that compliance threshold rose to 95 percent in 2016. For Applicable Large Employers, new requirements under the Shared Responsibility provision of the Affordable Care Act went into effect as of January 1, 2015. For employers with calendar year plans annual enrollment is finally done and most organizations believe that they have complied with the requirements of the ACA. However, now the hard part begins – tracking and storing the data necessary to document ACA compliance throughout the year.

ALEs—organizations that had, on average, 50 or more full-time equivalent employees during the preceding calendar year—use Form 1095-C to report whether they offered eligible employees that provides minimum essential coverage and meets the minimum value threshold. These requirements apply whether an ALE offered coverage through a group health plan or funded ICHRAs that employees used to purchase coverage for themselves and their families on an ACA marketplace exchange. The firm says the solution features rich analytics that can help empower employers to make smart, forward-looking workforce management decisions.

The Adp 2014 Midsized Business Owners Study

The federal individual mandate penalty ended this year, but employers’ responsibilities are still intact. In fact, nothing on the legislative horizon suggests the employer mandate will meet the same fate as the individual mandate. With large employers still obligated to offer affordable health plans or face potential penalties, it’s essential for your organization to properly track and understand its HR, payroll, benefits and leaves data. ICHRAs, pronounced “ick-rahs” by benefits advisors and vendors, and created under regulations the IRS issued in June 2019, allow employers to contribute a set dollar amount each year to each eligible full-time employee, tax-free. ALEs using ICHRAs to provide ACA-compliant health coverage must fund these accounts to allow employees to purchase coverage that meets the ACA’s affordability threshold. This means that for 2020, policy premiums must not have exceeded 9.78 percent of an employee’s income.

Whether seeking to comply with state or federal reporting requirements, organizations need solutions that simplify and streamline the process because of the inherent challenges of gathering and analyzing employee-related data from across the enterprise. Once data has been aggregated and its integrity confirmed, organizations should leverage solutions to apply proactive penalty measures to ACA measurements and status every month, by FEIN and by employee. It’s only once they have those solutions and visibility in place that they’ll be able to comply with ACA reporting requirements while minimizing the potential for costly penalties. In addition to reporting requirements and potential penalties at the federal level, there’s a growing number of states that require similar employer reporting. Additionally, California and Rhode Island announced their requirements for employer reporting and employee forms for tax year 2020. California has already defined potential penalties for those that do not fulfill these new employer reporting requirements; New Jersey is examining applying penalties to non-compliance as well. Finally, Connecticut, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington may soon enact their own ACA reporting requirements, watching the successes and developments of the first states and their reporting cycles.

Employers are now compelled according to ACA demands to ensure that the reporting forms of 1095 reach the hands of all employees. ACA compliance solutions are designed to keep your company compliant while reducing your human resources workload. The best software offerings will provide efficient, penalty-free compliance management in addition to detailed reporting.

Pitfalls When Choosing Aca Reporting Software

According to the ADP RI study, employers are shifting health care-related costs to their employees. About 70% of midsized organizations and 80% of large organizations are increasing the share of costs that they charge their employees in the form of deductibles and co-pays. More significantly, the study found that employers are beginning to emphasize consumerism into the health care cost equation through revised plan design. The competition to attract talent appears to be the core business reason driving these decisions. Specifically, at least half of all organizations surveyed indicate they are extending coverage to employees who do not qualify as ACA full-time.

Moreover, only a quarter of midsized employers surveyed already either have or are planning to limit the hours of at least some employees. Those ALE’s which have more than 50 employees hired on full-time basis last year will have to use the 1095 C form to show that they have given their employees the minimum essential coverage and the minimum value threshold too. These requirements are needed whether am ALE gave coverage via a group health plan or funded ICHRAs through which employees made coverage purchases for their selves and families from ACA marketplace exchanges. The IRS Publication 5223 explains how employers can prepare substitute forms to provide the required ACA reporting information to IRS and employees. In addition, A Time-and-Attendance tool provides workforce planning to improve time tracking, apply employee schedules and monitor employee hours to help clients comply with ACA’s employer shared-responsibility provisions.

When an employer knows exactly how many employees they plan to offer health coverage to, they can more accurately budget for the upcoming months and years. It also greatly reduces the risk of time and attendance tracking errors. The Affordable Care Act requires Applicable Large Employers to file and furnish information to IRS and employees every year. In case, if the employers fail to comply with ACA requirements, they may be subjected to significant IRS penalty assessments. To comply with the ACA Employer mandate, employers should meet the following deadlines.

Regulatory Management– ADP’s ACA experts provide notices of coverage, develop annual health care reports, manage exchange notices and reconcile ACA employer penalties. ADP says this fully outsourced service reduces administrative burdens for employers by supporting and streamlining all of the labor-intensive interactions between employers, employees and various government agencies. ADP Health Compliance is designed to help large employers manage the business challenges associated with the ACA. One common compliance challenge is that, while compliance reporting is annual, the deadlines are on tighter timeframes. For example, eligible full-time employees generally must be offered coverage that is affordable and provides minimum value, and penalties accumulate for every month that a company is not in compliance.

This means your HR team has to file 1095-C forms with the IRS for every employee that qualifies for health insurance. It can be time consuming for your HR team to file all that paperwork, and if there is any misinformation the IRS may issue hefty fees to your organization. Last year the IRS sent out its first penalty notices for 2015 ACA filings, about 30,000 letters containing $4.4 billion in penalty assessments. Meanwhile, penalty amounts have increased substantially for failing to offer coverage to eligible full-time employees, for offering “unaffordable” coverage or for failing to file the necessary tax forms.